Birch Cove

LAKE MONITORING WORKING GROUP

LAKE MONITORING WORKING GROUP

MEETING MAY 17/11

RED DEER ALBERTA

In Attendance:

Glenn Gustafson - Alberta Environment

Curtis Brock - Alberta Environment

Don Davidson SV of Grandview

Dennis Irving - Batiste Lake

Peter Langelle - SV Ma-Me-O

Purpose of the meeting:

  • To develop a place=based monitoring plan
  • Computerize data
  • Analyse data to identify trend - Keep it simple
  • Identify common outcomes to direct monitoring
  • Develop an integrated monitoring approach

There was much discussion about lots of expectations and current monitoring but it all boiled down to we were looking for consistant, reliable testing and reporting of:

  • Water Quality
  • And that SV`s would be interested in partnering with the government in this regard.

What's now monitored.

4 Lakes

  • Ethel
  • Baptiste
  • Wabamin
  • Nakamim

 Monitoring Process.

Every Year what lakes are to be tested for monitoring purposes is part of the departments budgeting process and depends on many factors:

  • Land and impact
  • Issues
  • Fact based concerns
  • Political Concerns

This Year Environment will be testing the following lakes:

  • Sylvan
  • Pigeon
  • Gull
  • Shoncliff
  • Wabamin

Testing Program:

Covers the complete range of chemical and biologics on three separate events during open water time. No winter testing

Next year the budget for testing may or may not be approved.

The province is considering setting up a separate monitoring section. A proposal is being prepared for the minister`s consideration. It is primarily for river system and lakes may or may not be included.

 

ALMS: Alberta lake management society

Funded and housed in Environment but are self directed. ALMS did testing in 2010 on a number of lakes including pigeon, in the absence of Environment doing this. Mostly testing ceased in 2000. And occurred again in 2008. In 2011 Alberta Environment will be testing the following lakes:

  • Sylvan
  • Pigeon
  • Gull
  • Shonecliffe

2012 and beyond uncertain

Some discussion took place as to how frequently testing should be done:

  • Every Year
  • Every two years
  • Every five years
  • Yes, and even Every 10 years

The longer the time between testing - the more changes that can occur before they are recognized and reacted to.

What data and graphs are available now?

Lots of data available, but we need to know how to access. There is a long delay in inputting data 2008 is in but 2010 is not. Route to access info is not user friendly. Need better links to the ASVA and other summer Villages web sites?

A successful joint lake water testing program is now functioning very well at Sylvan Lake. Volunteers were trained to take samples and send to the laboratory and they pay for the testing and resultant info is reliable and used to report by Environment

The cost for testing 3 separate events is approx. $2,000.00 per lake/yr.

Requesting Data:

SV`s can request data from Environment but process not clear, but environment will clarify.

TO DO:

  • Provide an access map of data available at this time.(Environment)
  • Send a protocol for testing partnership.(Environment)
  • Work on data management process that involves the ASVA and all SV`s(Environment and SV`s)
  • The ASVA convention program needs to include the ALMS.(ASVA)
  • Presentation by Environment  outlining lake testing history and way forward with options for partnering  between SV`s and Environment.(ASVA & Environment)
  • Present a partnership proposal to the SV`s of Pigeon Lake for testing in 2012 and beyond.(Pete Langelle and Don Davidson)
  • Next meeting 1st  2 weeks of October to see what`s in 2012 budget and review what happened in the summer of 2011.